“The harm of the combustible cigarette is dramatically more than the harm of the electronic cigarette. The combustible cigarette is probably the most harmful consumer product recognized to mankind, killing 480,000 people each year in america alone. This is largely due to the many deadly toxins created and released by the combustion. A panel of experts estimates that the electronic cigarette is 95 percent less harmful. Some push back on this study, in part questioning the ability to put an exact number on it. Another estimate is 90-98 percent less harmful. But whatever number is correct, Electronic Cigarette are dramatically less harmful than combustible cigarettes.
“There has become an effort to say that combustible cigarettes and e-cigarettes are equally harmful, that the companies are equally evil, and that they needs to be strongly regulated exactly the same way. This view is incorrect, nevertheless it has gotten significant traction. Polling indicates that 32 percent of Americans feel that combustible cigarettes and e-cigarettes are equally harmful. Which means that as many as 13 million adult smokers believe those to be equally harmful, and therefore are very unlikely to change when switching may save their lives. People making misstatements about e-cigarettes have the very best of intentions-to help keep kids from being addicted to nicotine through e-cigarettes. But adults misleading kids to get them to do whatever we want has long been a failed strategy.
“There also is a misconception concerning the prevalence of teen e-cigarette smoking. In accordance with the National Youth Tobacco Survey, 13 percent of American senior high school students smoked an e-cigarette once or more during the last 30 days. This includes regular use and experimental use. Since the figure is repeated, the number 13 percent is utilized without that qualification. After a number of repetitions, people then often assume that 13 percent are regular users. However, regular use-if based on usage in 20 or maybe more days in the last 30 days-is actually 2 percent. The numbers needs to be seen together-13 percent used e-cigarettes once or maybe more during the last 1 month; two percent have used an e-cigarette 20 or more days in the last 1 month.”
A report from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has finally debunked claims vape contains toxic formaldehyde. False headlines and rumours have been circulating since 2015 whenever a paper published in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) concluded vaping emitted the harmful chemical. The nation’s health protection agency has recently concluded that e-cigarette vapour contains forget about formaldehyde compared to the normal, everyday air found in the average American home. In reality, many residences probably have greater levels from regular textiles found around the home, like carpets and curtains.
A number of renowned researchers including top doctor Dr Konstantnos Farsalinos have spent earlier times three years trying to reassure vapers by conducting similar experiments to the new CDC study, which came to the same reassuring conclusion. Sadly, however, they fell on deaf ears and also the scaremongering rumors not merely continued to worry people and medical world but the misinformation has even shaped government policy across the world. The newest paper titled ‘Evaluation of Chemical Exposures with a Vape Shop’ has now been published on the CDC website, which can be viewed by the public.
They gathered their data by collecting air samples from vape shops where both customers and employees would be actively vaping. Unsurprisingly they found that regardless of the greater than average amount of vaping taking lvcney such outlets, the quality of air testing failed to produce measurable concentrations of formaldehyde or some other toxins. Consistent with the above, in 2017 the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) had been performing air sampling in vape shops through the entire state.
In his blog, Public Health Expert Dr. Michael Siegel shared the outcomes extracted from a relatively small and non-ventilated vape shop, where most of the employees and 13 customers were actively vaping while the sampling was happening – hence the surroundings experienced a top level of contact with second-hand vapor.